Washington - President Barack Obama, according to the White House, on his application for a new authorization of military force against extremist Islamic state, including the use of its proposal three years of military action immediately and the army American United States is open to negotiations with Congress.
After a week of holiday break, lawmakers return to Washington on Monday to begin work as requested by Obama. Part of the proposal of Mr. Obama Republican, said to be too successful mission is limited. Because the United States does not sign for another open war on the other hand, some Democrats want a detailed limit the authority of President Obama.
White House officials, but Obama has firmly with Iraq and Syria bases, US forces have operated beyond the international border, any where you can continue extremist Islamic geographical restriction State said he was opposed to. However, they, he and characterized in that it is willing to discuss a section of heated debate and there is room for the rest of the lot to the discussion within and ground forces of the three years in the Chairman's draft Obama to his offer.
"I am seeing this legislation," Well, we believe that there are certain things that need to be refined here, if we were, we could decide Congress Some of them can build more support for do not go to a member is to be surprised if it exists, it said in a serious press secretary Josh "" White House. "So I think you are right to assume that this reflects the point of start in this conversation. "
Obama, legally claim that does not require a new authority to continue the Islamic terrorist state - there for months on the basis of the authority given to George W · · President Bush after the terrorist attacks of September 11 I began a strike against them. However, critics, the use of these privileges Obama said to be scalable at best, with the White House is clearly, do not look at the dependence of authority as an ideal, I'll take a new position. These are, for that was not authorized to discuss the negotiations on the matter, the White House official said on condition of anonymity.
The White House now, if a new authorization was signed into law, Obama, more does not depend on the privileges that have been approved in 2001 to continue the Islamic group of the state, just new force in place the dependent you and says. Responsible for the White House, in Congress to add the restriction of the approval, he said it may be clear in the legislation. The officials, but they add that language, if you still can not place a new authentication, Obama announced that the only basis for considering operations on this extremist group.
Obama is a change in the law to interpret the road to have last year, to prevent the future president - if you do not, through precedent in the direct method, as adopted by Congress, once Obama's military action against re-authentication is I declare its sole authority.
California Rep. Adam Schiff, Democratic rank in the top House Intelligence Committee, as part of a new debate, we are promoting the White House to include the sunset of approval 2001.
"I we'm very skeptical about our ability to rewrite the approval in 2001, after crossing the discussion ISIL operation," Schiff said in an interview. "Appetite we go through the various tour I do not know how to do so ".
Obama and refined, finally said that he wants to abolish the approval of 2001. However, in addition to the Islamic state campaign President also, in the attack in Yemen in Guantanamo Bay and extremists, we use the law as a legal basis for the ongoing operations of the prison in other places.
As Mr. Obama should, if the fight against Islamic state is still ongoing - the proposal of Mr. Obama, come back to Congress three years of restrictions that require the next president to get the update allowed. It also has the role of land forces in an attempt to bridge the gap in Parliament, and proposes a ban on "persistent aggressive combat operations."
Obama, the language gave him the rescue mission, the use of special operations forces in military operations that can be performed on the leaders of the capacity and the Islamic state for the collection of information. It is, "as we have announced plans to Feb. 11, such as Afghanistan and Iraq, not the approval of another ground war," Obama said.
However, officials from the White House, as they are, so as to maintain the flexibility of the President for transmission to the land forces of the objectives and tasks when they need open to alternate language I say.
The major signal an uncertain future, the White House and the representative, the two parties if this is not the case, on top of the other to take responsibility to see through legislation want political failure of responsibility call.
"Now, because they are looking for something to expose the way to go and they come, but the incumbent," Foreign Relations Committee of the Senate President Bob Corker, R-Tenn., Over a period several weeks of legislation. In the plan and said the interview to be held a public hearing, Coker said it maintains the possibility of opening the best way for him to continue -. "The Start" whole fresh clean cloth first You can either change the proposal of Mr. Obama, either by you
After a week of holiday break, lawmakers return to Washington on Monday to begin work as requested by Obama. Part of the proposal of Mr. Obama Republican, said to be too successful mission is limited. Because the United States does not sign for another open war on the other hand, some Democrats want a detailed limit the authority of President Obama.
White House officials, but Obama has firmly with Iraq and Syria bases, US forces have operated beyond the international border, any where you can continue extremist Islamic geographical restriction State said he was opposed to. However, they, he and characterized in that it is willing to discuss a section of heated debate and there is room for the rest of the lot to the discussion within and ground forces of the three years in the Chairman's draft Obama to his offer.
"I am seeing this legislation," Well, we believe that there are certain things that need to be refined here, if we were, we could decide Congress Some of them can build more support for do not go to a member is to be surprised if it exists, it said in a serious press secretary Josh "" White House. "So I think you are right to assume that this reflects the point of start in this conversation. "
Obama, legally claim that does not require a new authority to continue the Islamic terrorist state - there for months on the basis of the authority given to George W · · President Bush after the terrorist attacks of September 11 I began a strike against them. However, critics, the use of these privileges Obama said to be scalable at best, with the White House is clearly, do not look at the dependence of authority as an ideal, I'll take a new position. These are, for that was not authorized to discuss the negotiations on the matter, the White House official said on condition of anonymity.
The White House now, if a new authorization was signed into law, Obama, more does not depend on the privileges that have been approved in 2001 to continue the Islamic group of the state, just new force in place the dependent you and says. Responsible for the White House, in Congress to add the restriction of the approval, he said it may be clear in the legislation. The officials, but they add that language, if you still can not place a new authentication, Obama announced that the only basis for considering operations on this extremist group.
Obama is a change in the law to interpret the road to have last year, to prevent the future president - if you do not, through precedent in the direct method, as adopted by Congress, once Obama's military action against re-authentication is I declare its sole authority.
California Rep. Adam Schiff, Democratic rank in the top House Intelligence Committee, as part of a new debate, we are promoting the White House to include the sunset of approval 2001.
"I we'm very skeptical about our ability to rewrite the approval in 2001, after crossing the discussion ISIL operation," Schiff said in an interview. "Appetite we go through the various tour I do not know how to do so ".
Obama and refined, finally said that he wants to abolish the approval of 2001. However, in addition to the Islamic state campaign President also, in the attack in Yemen in Guantanamo Bay and extremists, we use the law as a legal basis for the ongoing operations of the prison in other places.
As Mr. Obama should, if the fight against Islamic state is still ongoing - the proposal of Mr. Obama, come back to Congress three years of restrictions that require the next president to get the update allowed. It also has the role of land forces in an attempt to bridge the gap in Parliament, and proposes a ban on "persistent aggressive combat operations."
Obama, the language gave him the rescue mission, the use of special operations forces in military operations that can be performed on the leaders of the capacity and the Islamic state for the collection of information. It is, "as we have announced plans to Feb. 11, such as Afghanistan and Iraq, not the approval of another ground war," Obama said.
However, officials from the White House, as they are, so as to maintain the flexibility of the President for transmission to the land forces of the objectives and tasks when they need open to alternate language I say.
The major signal an uncertain future, the White House and the representative, the two parties if this is not the case, on top of the other to take responsibility to see through legislation want political failure of responsibility call.
"Now, because they are looking for something to expose the way to go and they come, but the incumbent," Foreign Relations Committee of the Senate President Bob Corker, R-Tenn., Over a period several weeks of legislation. In the plan and said the interview to be held a public hearing, Coker said it maintains the possibility of opening the best way for him to continue -. "The Start" whole fresh clean cloth first You can either change the proposal of Mr. Obama, either by you
0 Reviews:
Post Your Review